Free Access
Issue
Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 32, Number 1, January-February 2000
Page(s) 3 - 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2000103

References

1
Beniwal B.K., Hastings I.M., Thompson R., Hill W.G., Estimation of genetic parameters in selected lines of mice using REML with an animal model 1. Lean mass. Heredity 69 (1992) 352-360.
2
Bulmer M.G., The effect of selection on genetic variability, American Naturalist 105 (1971) 201-211.
3
Bulmer M.G., The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics, Clarendon Press Oxford, 1980.
4
Bünger L., Hill W.G., Inbred lines of mice derived from long-term divergent selection on fat content and body weight, Mammalian Genome 10 (1999) 645-648.
5
Cantet R.J.C., Birchmeier A.N., The effects of sampling selected data on method R estimates of h2, in: Proc. 6th World Congress Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. University of New England, Armidale, January 1998, Vol. 25, pp. 97-99.
6
Crook B.J., James J., Assymetry of response to selection for skin fold score in Australian merino sheep, in: Proc. 5th World Congress Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., University of Guelph, Guelph, August 1994, Vol. 19, pp. 53-56.
7
de Boer I.J.M., van Arendonk J.A.M., Prediction of additive and dominance effects in selected or unselected populations with inbreeding, Theor. Appl. Genet. 84 (1992) 451-459.
8
Dempfle L., Statistical aspects of design of animal breeding programs: A comparison among various selection strategies, in: Gianola D., Hammond K. (Eds.), Advances in statistical methods for the genetic Improvement of Livestock, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 98-117.
9
Eisen E., Selection of components for body composition in mice and rats. A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 23 (1989) 17-32.
10
Falconer D.S., Replicated selection for body weight in mice, Genet. Res. 22 (1973) 291-321.
11
Falconer D.S., Mackay T.D., Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th ed., Addisson Wesley Longman Limited, Essex, England, 1996.
12
Fisher R., The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance, Trans. Royal Soc. Edinburgh 52 (1918) 399-433.
13
Gianola D., Fernando R., Bayesian methods in animal breeding theory, J. Anim. Sci. 63 (1986) 217-244.
14
Hastings I.M., Hill W.G., A note on the effect of different selection criteria on carcass composition in mice, Anim. Prod. 48 (1989) 229-233.
15
Hastings I.M., Yang J., Hill W.G., Analysis of lines of mice selected on fat content. 4. Correlated responses in growth and reproduction, Genet. Res. 58 (1991) 253-259.
16
Heath S.C., Bulfield G., Thompson R., Keightley P., Rates of change of genetic parameters of body weight in selected mouse lines, Genet. Res. 66 (1995) 19-25.
17
Henderson C.R., Applications to linear models in animal breeding, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, 1984.
18
Hill W.G., Design of quantitative genetic selection experiments, in: Robertson A. (Ed.), Selection experiments in laboratory and domestic animals, CAB Farnham House, Slough, UK, 1980, pp. 1-13.
19
Hill W.G., Caballero A., Artificial selection experiments, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23 (1992) 287-310.
20
Hill W.G., Caballero A., Dempfle L., Prediction of response to selection within families, Genet. Sel. Evol. 28 (1996) 379-383.
21
Kennedy B.W., Use of mixed model methodology in analysis of designed experiments, in: Gianola D., Hammond K. (Eds.), Advances in statistical methods for the genetic Improvement of Livestock, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 77-94.
22
Kennedy B.W., Schaeffer L.R.S., Sorensen D.A., Genetic properties of animal models, J. Anim. Sci. 71 (Suppl. 2) (1988) 17-26.
23
Mäki-Tanila A., Kennedy B.W., Mixed model methodology under genetic models with small number of additive and non-additive loci, in: Proc. 3rd World Congress Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., University of Nebraska, July 1986, Vol. 12, pp. 443-447.
24
Meyer K., Restricted maximum likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative free algorithm, Genet. Sel. Evol. 21 (1989) 317-340.
25
Meyer K., DFREML version 3.0 User notes, University of New England, Armidale, 1998.
26
Meyer K., Hill W.G., Mixed model analysis of a selection experiment for food intake in mice, Genet. Res. 57 (1991) 71-81.
27
Patterson H.D., Thompson R., Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal, Biometrika 58 (1971) 545-554.
28
Sharp G., Hill W.G., Robertson A., Effects of selection on growth, body composition and food intake in mice, Responses in selected traits, Genet. Res. 43 (1984) 75-92.
29
Sorensen D., Kennedy B.W., Estimation of response to selection using least squares and mixed model methodology, J. Anim. Sci. 58 (1984) 1097-1103.
30
Sorensen D., Kennedy B.W., Estimation of genetic variances from selected and unselected populations, J. Anim. Sci. 59 (1984) 1213-1225.
31
Sorensen D., Kennedy B.W., Analysis of selection experiments using mixed model methodology, J. Anim. Sci. 63 (1986) 245-258.
32
Su G., Sorensen P., Sorensen D., Inferences about variance components and selection response for body weight in chickens, Genet. Sel. Evol. 29 (1997) 413-425.
33
van der Werf J.H.J., de Boer I.J.M., Estimation of additive genetic variance when base populations are selected, J. Anim. Sci. 68 (1990) 3124-3132.
34
Veerkamp R.F., Haley C.S., Knott S., Hastings I.M., The genetic basis of response in mouse lines divergently selected for body weight or fat content. II. The contribution of genes with a large effect, Genet. Res. 62 (1993) 177-182.
35
Villanueva B., Woolliams J., Gjerde B., Optimum designs for fish breeding programs under mass selection with an application in fish breeding, Animal Sci. 63 (1996) 563-576.
36
Wei M., Caballero A., Hill W.G., Selection response in finite populations, Genetics 144 (1996) 1961-1974.


Abstract

Copyright INRA, EDP Sciences

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.