Free Access
Issue
Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 32, Number 1, January-February 2000
Page(s) 41 - 56
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2000105

References

1
Bidanel J.P., Étude de stratégies de valorisation en croisement de la race Meishan. 3-Evaluation comparée de différents systèmes de croisement, in: 21$^{\rm
es}$ Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France, 31 January - 2 February 1989, Institut technique du porc, Paris, 1989, pp. 361-366.
2
Bidanel J.P., Estimation of crossbreeding parameters between Large White and Meishan porcine breeds. III. Dominance and epistatic components of heterosis on reproductive traits, Genet. Sel. Evol. 25 (1993) 639-657.
3
Bidanel J.P., Benefits and limits of increasingly sophisticated models for genetic evaluation: the example of pig breeding, in: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11-16 January, University of New England, Armidale, Australia, 1998, Vol. 25, pp. 577-584.
4
Bidanel J.P., Caritez J.C., Legault C., Estimation of crossbreeding parameters between Large White and Meishan porcine breeds. I. Reproductive performance, Genet. Sel. Evol. 21 (1989) 507-526.
5
Bidanel J.P., Caritez J.C., Legault C., Ten years of experiments with Chinese pigs in France. 2. Utilisation in crossbreeding, Pig News & Information 12 (1991) 239-243.
6
Bidanel J.P., Milan D., Chevalet C., Woloszyn N., Bourgeois F., Caritez J.C., Gruand J., Le Roy P., Bonneau M., Lefaucheur L., Mourot J., Prunier A., Désautés C., Mormède P., Renard C., Vaiman M., Robic A., Gellin J., Ollivier L., Détection de locus à effets quantitatifs dans le croisement entre les races porcines Large White et Meishan. Dispositif expérimental et premiers résultats, in: 30$^{\rm
es}$ Jour- nées de la Recherche Porcine en France, 3-5 February 1998, Institut technique du porc, Paris, pp. 117-125.
7
Bryner S.M., Mabry J.W., Bertrand J.K., Benyshek L.L., Kriese L.A., Estimation of direct and maternal heritability and genetic correlation for backfat and growth rate in swine using data from centrally tested Yorkshire boars, J. Anim. Sci. 70 (1992) 1755-1759.
8
Cantet R.J.C., Kress D.D., Anderson D.C., Doornbos D.E., Burfening P.J., Blackwell R.L., Direct and maternal variances and covariances and maternal phenotypic effects on preweaning growth of beef cattle, J. Anim. Sci. 66 (1988) 648-660.
9
Crump R.E., Haley C.S., Thompson R., Mercer J., Individual animal model estimates of genetic parameters for performance test traits of male and female Landrace pigs tested in a commercial nucleus herd, Anim. Sci. 65 (1997) 275-283.
10
Ducos A., Evaluation génétique des porcs contrôlés dans les stations publiques à l'aide d'un modèle animal multicaractère, Doctoral thesis, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon, France, 1994, 222 pp.
11
Ducos A., Bidanel J.P., Naveau J., Estimation of genetic parameters and genetic trends for production traits in the Sino - European Tiameslan composite line of pigs, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 109 (1992) 108-118.
12
Haley C.S., Avalos E., Smith C., Selection for litter size in the pig, Anim. Breed. Abstr. 56 (1988) 317-332.
13
Haley C.S., d'Agaro E., Ellis M., Genetic components of growth and ultrasonic fat depth traits in Meishan and Large White pigs and their reciprocal crosses, Anim. Prod. 54 (1992) 105-115.
14
Haley C.S., Lee G.J., Ritchie M., Comparative reproductive performance in Meishan and Large White pigs and their crosses, Anim. Sci. 60 (1995) 259-267.
15
Im S., Fernando R.L., Gianola D., Likelihood inferences in animal breeding under selection: a missing-data theory view point, Génét. Sél. Evol. 21 (1989) 399-414.
16
Johnson R.K., Crossbreeding in swine: experimental results, J. Anim. Sci. 52 (1981) 906-923.
17
Koch R.M., The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. VI. Maternal effects in beef cattle, J. Anim. Sci. 35 (1972) 1316-1323.
18
Koerhuis A.N.M., Thompson R., Models to estimate maternal effects for juvenile body weight in broiler chickens, Genet. Sel. Evol. 29 (1997) 225-249.
19
Lee G.J., Haley C.S., Comparative farrowing to weaning performance in Meishan and Large White pigs and their crosses, Anim. Sci. 60 (1995) 269-280.
20
Legault C., Caritez J.C., L'expérimentation sur le porc chinois en France. I-Performances de reproduction en race pure et en croisement. Génét. Sél. Evol. 15 (1983) 225-240.
21
Le Roy P., Naveau J., Elsen J.M., Sellier P., Evidence for a new major gene influencing meat quality in pigs, Genet. Res. 55 (1990) 33-40.
22
Le Roy P., Elsen J.M., Naveau J., Etude de la variabilité génétique de l'adiposité dans la lignée Laconie, in: 22$^{\rm
es}$ Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France, 30 January-1st February 1990, Institut technique du porc, Paris, 1990, pp. 11-16.
23
Ligonesche B., Bazin C., Bidanel J.P., Variabilité génétique du nombre de tétines chez le porc. Relations avec les caractères de production et de reproduction, in: 27$^{\rm
es}$ Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France, 31 January-2 February 1995, Institut technique du porc, Paris, pp. 121-126.
24
Lo L.L., Fernando R.L., Grossman M., Covariance between relatives in multibreed populations: additive model, Theor. Appl. Genet. 87 (1993) 1215-1228.
25
Lo L.L., Fernando R.L., Grossman M., Theory of modelling means and covariances in a two-breed population with dominance, Theor. Appl. Genet. 90 (1995) 49-62.
26
Maignel L., Bidanel J.P., Guéblez R., Intérêt d'une pesée au sevrage dans le contrôle de performances en ferme, in: 30$^{\rm
es}$ Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France, 3-5 February 1998, Institut technique du porc, Paris, pp. 101-107.
27
Merks J.W.M., Genotype $\times$ Environment interactions in pig breeding programmes. I. Central test station, Livest. Prod. Sci. 14 (1986) 365-381.
28
Meyer K., Approximate accuracy of genetic evaluation under an animal model, Livest. Prod. Sci. 21 (1989) 87-100.
29
Meyer K., Estimating variances and covariances for multivariate animal models by restricted maximum likelihood, Genet. Sel. Evol. 21 (1991) 317-340.
30
Meyer K., Bias and sampling covariances of estimates of variance components due to maternal effects, Genet. Sel. Evol. 24 (1992) 487-522.
31
Meyer K., Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Australian beef cattle, Livest. Prod. Sci. 31 (1992) 179-204.
32
Neumaier A., Groeneveld E., Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models, Genet. Sel. Evol. 30 (1998) 3-26.
33
Ollivier L., Dix ans d'une expérience de sélection individuelle sur des verrats utilisés en insémination artificielle. II. Paramètres génétiques estimés, Génét. Sél. Evol. 15 (1983) 99-118.
34
Patterson H.D., Thompson R., Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal, Biometrika 58 (1971) 545-554.
35
Robison O.W., The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. V. Maternal effects in swine, J. Anim. Sci. 35 (1972) 1303-1315.
36
Rodriguez M.C., Rodriganez J., Silio L., Genetic analysis of maternal ability in Iberian pigs, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 111 (1994) 220-227.
37
Rothschild M.F., Bidanel J.P., Biology and genetics of reproduction, in: Rothschild M.F., Ruvinsky A. (Eds.), The genetics of the pig, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 1998, pp. 313-343.
38
Sellier P., Genetics of meat and carcass traits, in: Rothschild M.F., Ruvinsky A. (Eds.), The genetics of the pig, CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 1998, pp. 463-510.
39
Sorensen D.A., Kennedy B.W., Estimation of genetic variance from unselected and selected populations, J. Anim. Sci. 59 (1984) 1213-1223.
40
Tess M.W., Bennett G.L., Dickerson G.E., Simulation of genetic changes in life cycle efficiency of pork production. II-Effects of components on efficiency, J. Anim. Sci. 56 (1983) 354-368.
41
Thompson R., The estimation of maternal genetic variance, Biometrics 32 (1976) 903-917.
42
Young L.D., Reproduction of F1 Meishan, Fengjing, Minzhu, and Duroc gilts and sows, J. Anim. Sci. 73 (1995) 711-721.


Abstract

Copyright INRA, EDP Sciences

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.