Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 34, Number 1, January-February 2002
|Page(s)||41 - 59|
Genet. Sel. Evol. 34 (2002) 41-59
Comparison between estimation of breeding values and fixed effects using Bayesian and empirical BLUP estimation under selection on parents and missing pedigree informationFlávio S. Schenkel, Lawrence R. Schaeffer and Paul J. Boettcher
Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Animal and Poultry Science Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada
(Received 11 December 2000; accepted 2 July 2001)
Bayesian (via Gibbs sampling) and empirical BLUP (EBLUP) estimation of fixed effects and breeding values were compared by simulation. Combinations of two simulation models (with or without effect of contemporary group (CG)), three selection schemes (random, phenotypic and BLUP selection), two levels of heritability (0.20 and 0.50) and two levels of pedigree information (0% and 15% randomly missing) were considered. Populations consisted of 450 animals spread over six discrete generations. An infinitesimal additive genetic animal model was assumed while simulating data. EBLUP and Bayesian estimates of CG effects and breeding values were, in all situations, essentially the same with respect to Spearman's rank correlation between true and estimated values. Bias and mean square error (MSE) of EBLUP and Bayesian estimates of CG effects and breeding values showed the same pattern over the range of simulated scenarios. Methods were not biased by phenotypic and BLUP selection when pedigree information was complete, albeit MSE of estimated breeding values increased for situations where CG effects were present. Estimation of breeding values by Bayesian and EBLUP was similarly affected by joint effect of phenotypic or BLUP selection and randomly missing pedigree information. For both methods, bias and MSE of estimated breeding values and CG effects substantially increased across generations.
Key words: breeding value / selection / Bayesian estimation / empirical BLUP / Gibbs sampling
Correspondence and reprints: Flávio S. Schenkel
© INRA, EDP Sciences 2002