Open Access
Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 39, Number 1, January-February 2007
Page(s) 3 - 25
References of  Genet. Sel. Evol. 39 (2007) 3-25
  1. Alizadeh F., Haeberly J.P.A., Overton M.L., Primal-dual interior point methods for semidefinite programming: convergence rates, stability and numerical results, SIAM J. Optim. 8 (1998) 746-768 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet].
  2. Belonsky G.M., Kennedy B.W., Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd, J. Anim. Sci. 66 (1988) 1124-1131 [PubMed].
  3. Benson S.J., Yinyu Y., DSDP5: Software for Semidefinite programming, ACM Trans. Math. Software (2005)
  4. Borchers B., CSDP, A C library for semidefinite programming, Optim. Methods Softw. 11 (1999) 613-623 [MathSciNet].
  5. Boyd S., Vandenberghe L., Convex programming, Cambridge University Press (2005).
  6. Brisbane J.R., Gibson J.P., Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic-relationships in selection decisions, Theor. Appl. Genet. 91 (1995) 421-431.
  7. Colleau J.J., Moureaux S., Briend J.B., A method for the dynamic management of variability in dairy cattle, Genet. Sel. Evol. 36 (2004) 373-394 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  8. Dekkers J.C.M., van Arendonk J.A.M., Optimizing selection for quantitative traits with information on an identified locus in outbred populations, Genet. Res. Camb. 71 (1998) 257-275.
  9. Fernando R.L., Grossman M., Marker assisted selection using best linear unbiased prediction, Genet. Sel. Evol. 21 (1989) 467-477.
  10. Fujisawa K., Kojima M., Nakata K., Yamashita M., SDPA (SemiDefinite Programming Algorithm) user's manual - version 6.00. Research Reports on Mathematical and Computer Sciences (2002) Series B: Operations Research.
  11. Grundy B., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A., Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development, Genet. Res., Camb. 72 (1998) 159-168.
  12. Karmarkar N., A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming, Combinatorica 4 (1984) 373-395 [MathSciNet].
  13. Kinghorn B.P., Meszaros S.A., Vagg R.D., Dynamic tactical decision systems for animal breeding, in: Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. (2002) CD-ROM Communications 23-07.
  14. Laurent M., Rendl F., Semidefinite programming and integer programming, in: Ardal K., Nemhauser G.L., Weismantel R. (Eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Discrete Optimization, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005) pp. 393-514.
  15. Meuwissen T.H.E., Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding, J. Anim. Sci. 75 (1997) 934-940 [PubMed].
  16. Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E., Prediction of genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps, Genetics 157 (2001) 1819-1829 [PubMed].
  17. Nesterov Y., Nemirovsky A., A general approach to polynomial-time algorithms design for convex programming, Technical Report (1988) Centr. Econ. & Math. Inst., USSR Acad. Sci., Moscow, USSR.
  18. Nesterov Y., Nemirovsky A., Interior-point polynomial methods in convex programming, Studies in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 13. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA (1994).
  19. Pong-Wong R., Woolliams J.A., Response to mass selection when an identified major gene is segregating, Genet. Sel. Evol. 30 (1998) 313-337.
  20. Vandenberghe L., Boyd S., Semidefinite programming, SIAM Review 38 (1996) 49-95 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet].
  21. Villanueva B., Pong-Wong R., Grundy B.,Woolliams J.A., Potential benefit from using an identified major gene and BLUP estimated breeding values in selection programmes, Genet. Sel. Evol. 31 (1999) 115-133.
  22. Villanueva B., Pong-Wong R., Woolliams J.A., Marker assisted selection with optimized contributions of the candidates to selection, Genet. Sel. Evol. 34 (2002) 679-703 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  23. Woolliams J.A., Modifications to MOET nucleus schemes to improve rates of genetic progress and decrease rates of inbreeding in diary-cattle, Anim. Prod. 49 (1989) 1-14.
  24. Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen T.H.E., Decision rules and variance of response in breeding schemes, Anim. Prod. 56 (1993) 179-186.
  25. Woolliams J.A., Thompson R., A theory of genetic contributions, Proc. 5th World Cong. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. 25 (1994) 127-134.
  26. Woolliams J.A., Pong-Wong R., Villanueva B., Strategic optimisation of short- and long- term gain and inbreeding in MAS and non-MAS schemes, in: Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. (2002) CD-ROM Communications 23-02.
  27. Wray N.R., Goddard M.E., Increasing long-term response to selection, Genet. Sel. Evol. 26 (1994) 431-451.
  28. Wu S.P., Boyd S., DPSOL: A parser/solver for semidefinite programs with matrix structure, in: El Ghaoui L., Niculescu S.I. (Eds.), Advances in linear matrix inequality methods in control, SIAM, 2000, pp. 79-91.