Free Access
Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 40, Number 2, March-April 2008
Page(s) 145 - 159
Published online 27 February 2008
References of  Genet. Sel. Evol. 40 (2008) 145-159
  1. Bluet B., Clément V., Martin P., Laloë D., Fouilloux M.N., Mise en place d'un nouveau critère de connexion génétique dans l'espèce caprine, Renc. Rech. Ruminants 13 (2006) 223.
  2. Chakrabarti C., On the C matrix in design for experiments, J. Indian Stat. Assoc. 1 (1963) 8-23.
  3. Clément V., L'indexation des caractères laitiers, Indexation caprine, IE-INRA (2001).
  4. Fouilloux M.N., Laloë D., A sampling method for estimating the accuracy of predicted breeding values in genetic evaluation, Genet. Sel. Evol. 33 (2001) 473-486 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [EDP Sciences].
  5. Fouilloux M.N., Laloë D., Évolution de la méthode d'appréciation de la connexion entre troupeaux, Note Iboval 28, IE-INRA (2002).
  6. Fouilloux M.N., Laloë D., Amélioration du calcul du CACO en 2005, Note IBOVAL 42, IE-INRA (2005).
  7. Foulley J.L., Hanocq E., Boichard D., A criterion for measuring the degree of connectedness in linear models of genetic evaluation, Genet. Sel. Evol. 24 (1992) 315-330 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  8. Fox J., The R Commander: A basic-statistics graphical user interface to R, J. Stat. Software 14 (2006) 1-42.
  9. Garcia-Cortes L.A., Moreno C., Varona L., Altarriba J., Estimation of prediction-error variances by resampling, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 112 (1995) 176-182.
  10. Huisman A.E., Tier B., Brown D.J., On assessing contrasts between groups of animals, Livest. Sci. (2006) 254-267.
  11. Journaux L., Fouilloux M.N., Guerrier J., Laloë D., Results of the genetic evaluation Iboval 2006 for the beef cattle breeds, Edition 2006/1, CR 010679103, Institut de l'Élevage, Paris, France (2006)
  12. Kennedy B.W., Trus D., Considerations on genetic connectedness between management units under a animal-model, J. Anim. Sci. 71 (1993) 2341-2352 [PubMed].
  13. Kuehn L.A., Lewis R.M., Notter D., Managing the risk of comparing estimated breeding values across flocks or herds through connectedness: a review and application, Genet. Sel. Evol. 39 (2007) 225-247 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [EDP Sciences].
  14. Laloë D., Precision and information in linear-models of genetic evaluation, Genet. Sel. Evol. 25 (1993) 557-576 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  15. Laloë D., Phocas F., A proposal of criteria of robustness analysis in genetic evaluation, Livest. Prod. Sci. 80 (2003) 241-256 [CrossRef].
  16. Laloë D., Phocas F., Ménissier F., Considerations on measures of precision and connectedness in mixed linear models of genetic evaluation, Genet. Sel. Evol. 28 (1996) 359-378 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  17. Lewis R.M., Crump R.E., Simm G., Thompson R., Assessing connectedness in across-flock genetic evaluations, Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Sci. (1999) 121.
  18. Mathur P.K., Sullivan B.P., Chesnais J.P., Measuring connectedness: concept and application to a large industry program, Proceedings of the 7th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 19-23 August 2002, Vol. 32, Montpellier, France, pp. 545-548.
  19. Numerical Algorithm Group, The NAG Fortran Library Manual, mark 16, The Numerical Algorithm Group limited, 1993.
  20. R Development Core Team, R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2006) ISBN: 3-900051-07-0;
  21. Roso V.M., Schenkel F.S., Miller S.R., Degree of connectedness among groups of centrally tested beef bulls, Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84 (2004) 37-47.
  22. Wood S.N., Generalized Additive Models: An introduction with R., 1st Edn., Chapman & Hall, University of Bath, England, 2006.