Free Access
Issue
Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 32, Number 3, May-June 2000
Page(s) 231 - 248
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2000116

References

1
Brisbane J.R., Gibson J.P., Balancing selection response and rate of inbreeding by including genetic relationships in selection decisions, Theor. Appl. Genet. 91 (1995) 421-431.
2
Caballero A., Santiago E., Toro M.A., Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations, Anim. Sci. 62 (1996) 431-442.
3
Fernández J., Toro M.A., The use of mathematical programming to control inbreeding in selection schemes, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 116 (1999) 447-466.
4
Fisher R.A., The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 52 (1918) 399-433.
5
Grundy B., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A., Maximising response with a predefined rate of inbreeding for overlapping generation structure, in: Proc. British Society of Animal Science, Scarborough, 1997, p. 27.
6
Grundy B., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A., Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development, Genet. Res. 72 (1998) 159-168.
7
Grundy B., Villanueva B., Woolliams J.A., Dynamic selection for maximizing response with constrained inbreeding in schemes with overlapping generations, Anim. Sci. (in press).
8
Hazeleger W., Kemp B., State of the art in pig embryo transfer, Theriogenology 51 (1999) 81-90.
9
Henderson C.R., Applications of Linear Models in Animal Breeding, University of Guelph Press, Guelph, 1984.
10
Kinghorn B.P., Mate selection by groups, J. Dairy. Sci. 81 (1998) 55-63.
11
Kruip T.A.M., Boni R., Wurth Y.A., Roelofsen M.W.M., Pieterse M.C., Potential use of Ovum Pick-Up for embryo production and breeding in cattle, Theriogenology 42 (1994) 675-684.
12
Meuwissen T.H.E., Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding, J. Anim. Sci. 75 (1997) 934-940.
13
Meuwissen T.H.E., Sonesson A.K., Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding: overlapping generations, J. Anim. Sci. 76 (1998) 2575-2583.
14
Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Minimization or maximization of functions, in: Numerical recipes- the art of scientific computing. University of Cambridge Press, 1989, pp. 274-334.
15
Reeve E.C.R., Studies in quantitative inheritance. III. Heritability and genetic correlation in progeny tests using different mating systems, J. Genet. 51 (1953) 520-542.
16
Robertson A., Inbreeding in artificial selection programmes, Genet. Res. 2 (1961) 189-194.
17
Santiago E., Caballero A., Effective size of populations under selection, Genetics 139 (1995) 1013-1030.
18
Sonesson A.K., Grundy B., Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen T.H.E., Selection with control of inbreeding in populations with overlapping generations: a comparison of methods, Anim. Sci. 70 (2000) 1-8.
19
Toro M.A., Nieto B., A simple method for increasing the response to artificial selection, Genet. Res. 44 (1984) 347-349.
20
Toro M.A., Nieto B., Salgado C., A note on minimisation of inbreeding in small-scale selection programmes, Livest. Prod. Sci. 20 (1988) 317-323.
21
Toro M., Pérez-Enciso M., Optimisation of selection response under restricted inbreeding, Genet. Sel. Evol. 22 (1990) 93-107.
22
Woolliams J.A., Modifications to MOET nucleus breeding schemes to improve rates of genetic progress and decrease rates of inbreeding in dairy cattle, Anim. Prod. 49 (1989) 1-14.
23
Wray N.R., Goddard M.E., Increasing long-term response to selection, Genet. Sel. Evol. 26 (1994) 431-451.
24
Wright S., Systems of mating. I. The biometric relations between parent and offspring, Genetics 6 (1921) 111-123.


Abstract

Copyright INRA, EDP Sciences