EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 35 / No 4 (July-August 2003) Genet. Sel. Evol., 35 4 (2003) 369-383 References
Free Access
Issue
Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 35, Number 4, July-August 2003
Page(s) 369 - 383
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2003029

References

  1. Baumung R., Sölkner J., Analysis of pedigrees of Tux-Zillertal, Carinthian Blond and Original Pinzgau cattle populations in Austria, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 119 (2002) 175-181.
  2. Boichard D., Maignel L., Verrier É., The value of using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population, Genet. Sel. Evol. 29 (1997) 5-23.
  3. Caballero A., Toro M.A., Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations, Genet. Res. 75 (2000) 331-343.
  4. Caballero A., Toro M.A., Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations, Conserv. Genet. 3 (2002) 289-299.
  5. Christensen L.G., Madsen P., Petersen J., The influence of incorrect sire-identification on the estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values, in: Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Madrid, 4-8 October, 1982, Vol. 7, pp. 200-208.
  6. Eding H., Meuwissen T., Marker-based estimates of between and within population kinships for the conservation of genetic diversity, J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 118 (2001) 141-159.
  7. Geldermann H., Pieper U., Weber W.E., Effects of misidentification on the estimation of breeding value and heritability in cattle, J. Anim. Sci. 63 (1986) 1759-1768.
  8. Jacquard A., Inbreeding: One word, several meanings, Theor. Pop. Biol. 7 (1975) 338-363.
  9. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C., Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn., Longmann, London, 1996.
  10. Kavar T., Brem G., Habe F., Sölkner J., Dovc P., History of Lipizzan horse maternal lines as revealed by mtDNA analysis, Genet. Sel. Evol. 34 (2002) 635-638.
  11. Lacey R.C., Ballou J.D., Princée F., Starfield A., Thompson E.A., Pedigree analysis for population management, in: Ballou J.D., Gilpin M., Foose T.J. (Eds.), Population management for survival and recovery, Columbia university Press, New York, 1995, pp. 57-75.
  12. Lynch M., Ritland K., Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers, Genetics 152 (1999) 1753-1766.
  13. Malécot G., Les mathématiques de l'hérédité, Masson, Paris, 1948.
  14. Ron M., Blanc Y., Band M., Ezra E., Weller J.I., Misidentification rate in the Israeli dairy cattle population and its implications for genetic improvement, J. Dairy Sci. 79 (1996) 676-681.
  15. Sölkner J., Filipcic L., Hampshire N., Genetic variability of populations and similarity of subpopulations in Austrian cattle breeds determined by analysis of pedigree, Anim. Sci. 67 (1998) 249-256.
  16. Tempelton A.R., Read B., Inbreeding: One word, several meanings, much confusion, in: Loeschke V., Tomiuk J., Jain S.K. (Eds.), Conservation Genetics, Birkhäuser Verlag Basel, Switzerland, 1994, pp. 91-105.
  17. Toro M.A., Silió L., Rodrigánez J., Rodriguez C., Fernández J., Optimal use of genetic markers in conservation programmes, Genet. Sel. Evol. 31 (1999) 255-261.
  18. Toro M.A., Barragán C., Óvilo C., Rodriganez J., Rodriguez C., Silió L., Estimation of coancestry in Iberian pigs using molecular markers, Conserv. Genet. 3 (2002) 309-320.
  19. VanRaden P.M., Accounting for inbreeding and crossbreeding in genetic evaluation for large populations, J. Dairy Sci. 75 (1992) 3136-3144.
  20. Wang J., An Estimator for Paorwise Relatedness Using Molecular Markers, Genetics 160 (2002) 1203-1215.
  21. Wright S., Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship, Am. Nat. 56 (1922) 330-338.
  22. Zechner P., Sölkner J., Druml T., Baumung R., Achmann R., Bodo I., Marti E., Habe F., Brem G., Analysis of diversity and population structure in the Lipizzan horse breed based on pedigree information, Livest. Prod. Sci. 77 (2002) 137-146.
Abstract

Copyright INRA, EDP Sciences