EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 35 / No 5 (September-October 2003) Genet. Sel. Evol., 35 5 (2003) 457-468 References
Free Access
Issue
Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 35, Number 5, September-October 2003
Page(s) 457 - 468
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2003034
\n This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. ), CBLU, University of Leeds * revised and updated by: Marcus Hennecke, Ross Moore, Herb Swan * with significant contributions from: Jens Lippmann, Marek Rouchal, Martin Wilck and others -->

References

  1. Agresti A., A model for repeated measurements of a multivariate binary response, J. R. Statist. Assoc. 92 (1997) 315-322.
  2. Albert J., Chib S., Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data, J. R. Statist. Assoc. 88 (1993) 669-679.
  3. Ali T.E., Schaeffer L.R., Accounting for covariances among test days milk yield in dairy cows, Can. J. Anim. Sci. 67 (1987) 637.
  4. Coull B.A., Agresti A., Random effects modeling of multiple binary responses using the multivariate binomial logit-normal distribution, Biometrics 56 (2000) 73-80.
  5. Dempster E.R., Lerner I.M., Heritability of threshold characters, Genetics 35 (1950) 212-236.
  6. Devroy L., Non-uniform random variate generation, Springer, New York, 1986.
  7. Foulley J.L., Gianola D., Im S., Genetic evaluation for discrete polygenic traits in animal breeding, in: Gianola D., Hammond K. (Eds.), Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp. 361-396.
  8. Jamrozik J., Schaeffer L.R., Dekkers J.C.M., Random regression models for production traits in Canadian Holsteins. Proc. Open Session INTERBULL Annu. Mtg., Veldhoven, The Netherlands, Int. Bull Eval. Serv. Bull. No. 14 (1996) 124, Dep. Anim. Breed. Genet., SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
  9. Gianola D., Theory and analysis of threshold characters, J. Anim. Sci. 54 (1982) 1079-1096.
  10. Gianola D., Foulley J.L., Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model, Génét. Sél. Évol. 14 (1983) 201-224.
  11. Newton A.M., Raftery A.E., Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood Bootstrap, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 56 (1994) 3-48.
  12. Ptak E., Schaeffer L.R., Use of test day yields for genetic evaluation of dairy sires and cows, Livest. Prod. Sci. 34 (1993) 23-34.
  13. Rekaya R., Carabano M.J., Toro M.A., Use of test day yields for the genetic evaluation of production traits in Holstein-Friesian cattle, Livest. Prod. Sci. 57 (1999) 203-217.
  14. Rodriguez-Zas S.L., Gianola D., Shook G.E., Factors affecting susceptibility to intramammary infection and mastitis: An Approximate Bayesian Analysis, J. Dairy Sci. 80 (1997) 75-85.
  15. Sorensen D.A., Andersen S., Gianola D., Korsgaard I., Bayesian inference in threshold models using Gibbs sampling, Genet. Sel. Evol. 17 (1995) 229-249.
  16. Wright S., An analysis of variability in number of digits in an inbred strain of guinea pigs, Genetics 19 (1934) 506-536.
Abstract

Copyright INRA, EDP Sciences