EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 35 / No 5 (September-October 2003) Genet. Sel. Evol., 35 5 (2003) 469-487 References
Free Access
Issue
Genet. Sel. Evol.
Volume 35, Number 5, September-October 2003
Page(s) 469 - 487
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:2003035

References

  1. Bink M., Quaas R.L., van Arendonk J.A.M., Bayesian estimation of dispersion parameters with a reduced animal model including polygenic and QTL effects, Genet. Sel. Evol. 30 (1998) 103-125.
  2. Cantet R.J.C., Gianola D., Misztal I., Fernando R.L., Estimates of dispersion parameters and of genetic and environmental trends for weaning weight in Angus cattle using a maternal animal-model with genetic grouping, Livest. Prod. Sci. 34 (1993) 203-212.
  3. Cardoso F.F., Tempelman R.J., Bayesian inference on uncertain paternity for prediction of genetic merit, J. Anim. Sci. 79 Suppl. 1 (2001) 111.
  4. Chib S., Carlin B.P., On MCMC sampling in hierarchical longitudinal models, Stat. Comput. 9 (1999) 17-26.
  5. DeNise S., Using parentage analysis in commercial beef operations, in: Proceedings of the Beef Improvement Federation, 31st Annual Research Symposium and Annual Meeting, June 1999, Roanoke, Virginia, pp. 183-190.
  6. Famula T.R., Simple and rapid inversion of additive relationship matrices incorporating parental uncertainty, J. Anim. Sci. 70 (1992) 1045-1048.
  7. Foulley J.L., Gianola D., Planchenault D., Sire evaluation with uncertain paternity, Génét. Sél. Évol. 19 (1987) 83-102.
  8. Foulley J.L., Thompson R., Gianola D., On sire evaluation with uncertain paternity, Genet. Sel. Evol. 22 (1990) 373-376.
  9. Gelfand A.E., Model determination using sampling-based methods, in: Gilks W.R., Richardson S., Spiegelhalter D.J. (Eds.), Marcov chain Monte Carlo in practice, 1st edn., Chapman & Hall, London, 1996, pp. 145-161.
  10. Henderson C.R., A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values, Biometrics 32 (1976) 69-83.
  11. Henderson C.R., Use of an average numerator relationship matrix for multiple- sire joining, J. Anim. Sci. 66 (1988) 1614-1621.
  12. Perez-Enciso M., Fernando R.L., Genetic evaluation with uncertain parentage - a comparison of methods, Theor. Appl. Genet. 84 (1992) 173-179.
  13. Quaas R.L., Additive genetic model with groups and relationships, J. Dairy Sci. 71 (1988) 1338-1345.
  14. Quaas R.L., Pollak E.J., Mixed model methodology for farm and ranch beef cattle testing programs, J. Anim. Sci. 51 (1980) 1277-1287.
  15. Rosa G.J.M., Yandell B.S., Gianola D., A Bayesian approach for constructing genetic maps when markers are miscoded, Genet. Sel. Evol. 34 (2002) 353-369.
  16. Spiegelhalter D.J., Best N.G., Carlin B.P., van derLinde A., Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 64 (2002) 583-616.
  17. Sullivan P.G., Alternatives for genetic evaluation with uncertain parentage, Can. J. Anim. Sci. 75 (1995) 31-36.
  18. Wang C.S., Rutledge J.J., Gianola D., Bayesian-analysis of mixed linear-models via Gibbs sampling with an application to litter size in Iberian pigs, Genet. Sel. Evol. 26 (1994) 91-115.
  19. Westell R.A., Quaas R.L., Van Vleck L.D., Genetic groups in an animal-model, J. Dairy Sci. 71 (1988) 1310-1318.
Abstract

Copyright INRA, EDP Sciences